Japanese Kodachi Sword

The CGIL di Sondrio

Con la gestione dei privati l’acqua potabile costerà fino al 30% in più, e la Provincia di Sondrio rischierà di diventare «terra di conquista» per le multinazionali: per questo è la denuncia - è importante sostenere i referendum della campagna «Acqua, bene comune», e raggiungere il traguardo delle 500mila firme entro luglio. Lo dice la Cgil di Sondrio, che ieri è scesa ufficialmente in campo a sostegno della mobilitazione che punta a portare alle urne tre referendum per abrogare altrettante normative che «in questi anni hanno spinto verso la privatizzazione dell’acqua», cioè l’articolo 23 bis della legge 133/2008 e gli articoli 150 e 154 del decreto legislativo 156/2006, alias il Codice dell’ambiente.

We speak of laws and clauses, stressed yesterday the representatives of the CGIL, but do not make the mistake of thinking that is an issue abstract, abstruse or hidden from public view. "With these measures - said the provincial secretary of the union Giocondo Cerri - moving from a public management of water distribution services to a management allocated through a tender with the private sector, or with joint ventures in which institutions public should have a weight not exceeding 40%, and this should be done by December 31
2010. But water is a fundamental right of all citizens, a common good, and should remain so. " "With these rules - stressed Ettore Armanasco - drinking water from public service becomes a commodity like any other, on which you can make profits. The result is that in other parts of Italy where the models of private management have already been applied with rising rates for individuals and families also came to 30 percent, and in other European countries there are cases trouble like that. " The risk, in other words, according to the promoters of the referendum is to get to pay for drinking water ... weight in gold, with very heavy price rises of the current costs for families: "The service assigned to the race - has remarked Armanasco - will be the 'last mile', the distribution of water agli utenti, proprio quello che può fare gola a chi vuol trarre profitto». Ma non finisce qui, perché secondo il comitato promotore dei referendum assegnare i servizi con le gare d’appalto in sostanza significa, per i meccanismi di mercato, aprire le porte alle grandi multinazionali del settore: un rischio che secondo i sindacalisti vale anche per la provincia di Sondrio. «Qualcuno tempo fa ha definito la Valtellina “il Kuwait dell’acqua”, per la sua grande ricchezza di risorse idriche - ha sottolineato Armanasco - e un territorio come il nostro in questo senso può far gola ad un grande gruppo multinazionale, non in sé e per sé ma come tassello di una strategia a lungo termine. E le grandi aziende are also able to implement actions of "dumping" to beat the competition, then maybe get benefits years later. " Networks and services in the valley are currently in the hands of municipalities or public corporations, "with positive results," remarked still Armanasco, "but also in the Valley have to open a real debate about how to use the water resource in an increasingly accurate, economic and efficient. " But the goal according to the CGIL you do not get "forcing our small towns to do the bidding and handed over to multinationals, because - he said Armanasco -

Where Can I Buy Bulk Chicken Wings

Collect Signatures for referendums also Grosio

Valgrosina Friends of The Committee organizes the collection of signatures for submission referenda on the water on 23 May, at the national mountain bike race, junior, in Grosse Ile.

How Soon Does Metformin Work Pcos

May Day Festivities at the club "Il Forno" Ponte in Valtellina.

Kate Moss Minnetonka 2010

WARRANT THE MOUNTAIN THE RIGHT TO WATER FOR ALL PEOPLE: DIFENDIAMOLA (Full program)

Full Head Versus Half Head Highlights

Giumelli: water for persons and goods in danger of becoming

start shortly in Italy, in Valtellina, the collection of signatures for the referendum against the privatization of water. On this subject, has recently been debated and held a crowded meeting in Ponte Valtellina. When you have to make choices is always useful to know the terms. A first question we must ask is: to what extent it is lawful to privatize (commercialize) the water has always been considered a common good? Water is becoming the gold in the future and there are those who think of going to conquer this new mine.

It is argued that even if that happens, the sources and the network will continue to be public property, despite the grant to individuals. We must note that the water right is exercised, and is specified when it flows from the tap and drinking water. Not practicing or going to the water at source. It is exercised through the management and delivery thereof. It 's always useful to know how else to behave. Most European countries have blocked the privatization or, as in France, has ripubblicizzata water. Switzerland has declared the waters and the state monopoly networks and, therefore, not privatized. Belgium has established that the water supply is managed in house. The stake is in the hands of municipalities. The U.S. has determined that the management of water systems in both municipalities. Uruguay, Bolivia, Ecuador and Chile have the constitutionally enshrined right to water. The privatization of water is very alarming because it is so important whether property passed into private hands of its management will be driven by profit. Must necessarily be profitable. It must be remembered that water is good that you can not ever give up and that there are no substitutes for it. Happen, then, that the 8 million Italian citizens who have no access to water, continue to live in this condition, it is likely that the 18 million who drink untreated water will continue to drink this. Similar situation can be remedied if you invest about 62 million €. You must rearrange the Italian water system and make it efficient. Are probably high investment that individuals do not intend to hand. The privatization will certainly lead to higher prices. E 'already happened. Not valid claim that the tendering exercise and the stock exchange in the reductive sense salvific actions affect prices. Past privatizations have taught us. The privatization will affect the controls. Loosen them and, perhaps, the treated water and check that they are paid in many municipalities (the so-called water of the mayor) will no longer own or they will be less. This is not to demonize the private sector. You just want to point out that a common good can not become a commodity. If the water becomes a commodity invariably be subject to the laws that the market will reserve the goods.

Giumelli William, from "The Province of Sondrio - 8/4/2010"

How To Make A Wedding Special For A Friend

WARRANT THE MOUNTAIN THE RIGHT TO WATER FOR ALL NATIONS: The DIFENDIAMOLA

Mountain Wilderness Italy, the Italian Forum of Water Movements, Cyprus Italy, Gruppo Abele and Engineers Without Borders promotes, from 20 to April 24 in Alta Valtellina, the days "LA MONTAGNA GARANTISCE IL DIRITTO ALL'ACQUA A TUTTI I POPOLI: DIFENDIAMOLA".

Il programma esteso è scaricabile all'indirizzo http://www.montagnadilombardia.com/acqua/programma.pdf

Difference Between A Bunny And A Rabbit

IdV does not sabotage the referendum on water

Swallowing Tooth Mousse

Public Water: the part referendum

have been filed in the Supreme Court this morning the three referendum questions on behalf of public water supply. This was announced by the Forum movement to the water on March 20 last year staged a demonstration in Rome, which was set up as "Public Water Referendum Committee. In a press conference to present the referendum campaign, the organizers have released the contents of the three questions that seek to eliminate the provisions in question. In the first calling for the repeal of Article 23 bis - Act 166 of 2009 (Public Services of local economic importance). The provisions of this Article governing the award e la gestione dei servizi pubblici locali di rilevanza economica. Nel secondo quesito si chiede l'abrogazione dell'art. 150 del Decreto Legislativo n. 152 del 2006 (norme in materia ambientale) che riguarda la «Scelta della forma di gestione e procedure di affidamento». Infine il terzo quesito chiede sia abrogato il comma 1, dell'art. 154 (tariffa del servizio idrico integrato) del decreto legislativo n. 152 del 2006 (norme in materia ambientale), limitatamente alla seguente parte: «dell'adeguatezza della remunerazione del capitale investito». (ANSA).




http://www.controlacrisi.org/joomla/ambiente/acqua-depositati-quesiti-referendari-dal-comitato-per-la-ripublicizzazione.html